"Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To" (murdersofa)
05/17/2017 at 11:22 • Filed to: None
0
4|
"Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To" (murdersofa)
05/17/2017 at 11:22 • Filed to: None | 0
| 4 |
Haven’t heard this song in 6+ years when I listened to 96kbps mp3s on a $20 2.1 computer speaker. Amazing how different music sounds now on my Audio-Technicas or my vintage Pioneer stereo.
Tareim - V8 powered
> Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
05/17/2017 at 11:33 |
|
it will sound better if you have a decent copy of it rather than youtube
Thomas Donohue
> Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
05/17/2017 at 11:43 |
|
U2be at the 480p resolution above will only give you 128k
MP3 (assuming the source was that good). And it could be as low as 64k
in a 280p stream. I won’t get into compression and mastering for internet-based media....it’s probably mixed for shitty PC speakers.
But, good speakers are always better. Though you’re probably getting TOO much bass now. I take that back, that song probably doesn’t have a limit to how much bass they want to pump.
|
Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
> Thomas Donohue
05/17/2017 at 11:56 |
|
Yeah, 480p resolution sounds pretty garbage but what bitrate does it give at 1080p? From what I’m reading it mixes to 384kbps AAC in a 1080p@30fps video (10mBps) which most of these musicy videos tend to be. That is *more* than adequate for 99.9999999% of listening situations. What I should do is rip a song from a CD and then download it from Youtube and compare the two in Audacity to see what kind of equalization or compression is going on.
for Michigan
> Jake - Has Bad Luck So You Don't Have To
05/17/2017 at 12:06 |
|
Florida man, is that you?